Here is a list of important UK and European case law that has shaped the legal framework for asylum claims in the UK, including refugee status and humanitarian protection under the Refugee Convention and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR):
🔑 Core UK Asylum Case Law
1. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Sivakumaran [1988] AC 958
Court: House of Lords
Importance: Leading case on the standard of proof in asylum claims.
✅ Key Points:
- The correct test is a “reasonable degree of likelihood” of persecution—not the criminal standard ("beyond reasonable doubt").
- Widely applied to all refugee and humanitarian protection claims.
2. Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] UKHL 11
Court: House of Lords
Importance: Sets out how tribunals should assess proportionality in Article 8 ECHR claims related to removal or deportation.
✅ Key Points:
- The tribunal must make its own assessment of proportionality.
- Courts should not defer entirely to the Secretary of State’s view.
3. Chahal v United Kingdom (1996) 23 EHRR 413
Court: European Court of Human Rights
Importance: Landmark case on non-refoulement under Article 3 of the ECHR.
✅ Key Points:
- Even in cases of national security, a person cannot be deported if there’s a real risk of torture or inhuman/degrading treatment.
- Confirms that Article 3 is absolute.
4. HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 31
Court: UK Supreme Court
Importance: Groundbreaking case on persecution due to sexual orientation.
✅ Key Points:
- Refugees cannot be expected to “live discreetly” to avoid persecution.
- If someone would modify their behaviour to avoid ill-treatment, they are still entitled to asylum.
5. Fornah v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UKHL 46
Court: House of Lords
Importance: Recognised gender-based persecution, specifically female genital mutilation (FGM), as a basis for asylum.
✅ Key Points:
- Women at risk of FGM can be considered members of a “particular social group” under the Refugee Convention.
- A major development in protection for women fleeing harmful cultural practices.
6. RT (Zimbabwe) & Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 38
Court: UK Supreme Court
Importance: Political opinion and forced concealment of beliefs.
✅ Key Points:
- Asylum must be granted if someone would have to conceal their political views to avoid persecution.
- Similar in reasoning to HJ (Iran).
7. Karanakaran v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2000] 3 All ER 449
Court: Court of Appeal
Importance: Addresses how to treat uncertain evidence in asylum claims.
✅ Key Points:
- Decision-makers should assess the whole picture, including evidence that may not be certain.
- Highlights the cumulative effect of various elements of risk.
8. EM (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 12
Court: UK Supreme Court
Importance: Risk of inhuman/degrading treatment on removal, even when someone doesn't qualify as a refugee.
✅ Key Points:
- Return to Eritrea would violate Article 3 ECHR due to forced conscription and risk of detention and torture.
- Reinforces the role of humanitarian protection separate from refugee status.